 Alright
Luann de Lesseps snagged a Count and eventually became a
so-called Countess (I really hope that these
Britons
will stop using these titles that run counter the modern
principle of egalitarianism), but does that make her a
relationship goddess? Hell no.
So here is some news coming out that she dispensed
unsolicited advice to two
New
Yorkers (one of them is Lilian Raji) at a bar.
"When
men see females on their BlackBerrys working hard,
it really turns them off....Men
like women to be females, to not be like
workaholics, as that comes off as being
uptight in the bedroom and control freaks," she
said.
Oh really! On the contrary, when I see a woman doing
that, I appreciate the fact that she likes to
stay in
touch with people in her life and is
not a
technophobe. And yes, I want
women to be girlie but one of my most exciting
preferences is
making love to a
woman in her business suit, underneath which she
wears
lingerie. And where did she come up with this stupid
idea that just because a
woman has a career and enjoys what she does, she
does not like to
have a
good time in bed. On the contrary, I have found that
career-driven and ambitious women are equally
wild in the bedroom.
Then she goes on to stereotype
Asian women. I think I like
Asian women too as I like all women and maybe some
of them can be more "interesting" for us just because
they are "different." But de Lesseps goes on to say, "My
European friends in particular adore
Asian females because of their
submissiveness."
What is she thinking? Does she still live in the past?
Has she
traveled to Asia lately?
Asian
women are
focused on their careers, they hold
powerful jobs, and by no means I will call them
submissive.
Hey Countess, just shut up and go back to being a
desperate housewife. |
